This is a discussion on Re: jdk16 build failure on 7.0R/i386 - FreeBSD ; Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Kurt Miller wrote: > >> Daniel Eischen wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Kurt Miller wrote: >>> >>>> Weird. It seems like gcc(1)/ld(1) has changed the way -pthread is ...
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Kurt Miller wrote:
>> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Kurt Miller wrote:
>>>> Weird. It seems like gcc(1)/ld(1) has changed the way -pthread is
>>>> handled. In 6.X
>>>> and below it will record a NEEDED entry for libpthread even if the
>>>> doesn't reference any pthread symbols. I suspect that in 7.X if the
>>>> doesn't reference any pthread symbols it wont record the NEEDED entry.
>>> No, for binaries it works the same way on 7.x as 6.x.
>>> $ gcc -o k k.c -pthread
>>> $ ldd k
>>> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2807c000)
>>> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2808f000)
>>> I believe that -pthread does now act differently in 7.0+ when used
>>> to build shared libraries. Prior to 7.0, using -pthread to build
>>> shared libraries would not record a dependency on libpthread,
>>> whereas in 7.0+ it will record a dependency.
>>> Other than that, the only change in 7.0 is that libthr is now the
>>> default instead of libkse (nee libpthread).
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Hmm, well I'm perplexed then. I can't see why
>> work/control/build/bsd-i586/bin/java isn't recording the NEEDED on
>> libthr.so. Perhaps the -Wl,-soname=lib.so argument or the double
>> -pthread is the culprit. Can you experiment on 7.0 to see if they are
>> involved at all?
> I was able to get jdk16 built on 7.0. Previously (unsuccessfully),
> I was trying to use jdk-220.127.116.11p5,1 to build jdk16. When that
> didn't work, I installed jdk-18.104.22.168p7_4,1 from a package that
> I had built on another box. So using jdk-22.214.171.124p7_4,1, I was
> able to build jdk-126.96.36.199p4. I also used the same package
> (jdk-188.8.131.52p7_4,1) to update jdk15 to the latest patchset
> (jdk-184.108.40.206p8,1). So now the latest patchset of both jdk15
> and jdk16 have been built using jdk-220.127.116.11p7_4,1. I have
> not tried to rebuild either jdk15 or jdk16 using either of
> the up-to-date jdks.
> BTW, this was all done manually (cd /usr/ports/java/jdk1X;
> make; make install). portupgrade wanted to install compat6x
> and diablo for no apparent reason, when there was already
> a perfectly good native jdk installed.
Ok so you and others can build the jdks fine on 7.0R. I guess I'm out of
ideas as to why Scott and Nicolas's systems don't record the dependency
> BTW2, the build of jdk16 was a lot faster than that of jdk15,
> which surprised me.
In 1.6 the debug portion of the build can be optionally turned off using
SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD="true" which is the default. In 1.5 the hotspot
debug binaries are always built (although only installed if the port
DEBUG option is on).
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"