Bakul Shah wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:23:33 EST wrote:
>> One of the folks I'm working with found this. The following code,
>> which yes, is just an example, is 1/2 as fast on 7.0-RELEASE as on
>> 6.3. Where should I look to find out why?

> Specifying malloc option K (double virtual memory chunk size)
> roughly halves the runtime. Additional Ks reduce it more and
> more. As this test spends most of its time in the kernel,
> may be this is just due to the mmap overhead? Or may be the
> defaults for 6.3 were different.

Well, the whole architecture of malloc is different.

I also see a big performance cliff (drops by a factor of 10) when malloc
size exceeds the chunk size (1MB by default). Also concurrent access to
mmapped memory performs badly in FreeBSD right now. I have patches that
convert the vm_map lock to a sx to avoid this contention, but they need
some more work.

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""