This is a discussion on Re: epoll patch for review - FreeBSD ; On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:26:59 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote: > > Oh... with fc4 or f7? What's the lib? Maybe we (bsam and/or me) can a > > find it and add it as a port. > > check ...
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:26:59 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote:
> > Oh... with fc4 or f7? What's the lib? Maybe we (bsam and/or me) can a
> > find it and add it as a port.
> check ltp-full-20061121/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll/README.1ST
> it needs some couroutine library etc.
I think that you misunderstood that README a little. The case is when
the file epoll.h is absent at the system. But when it presents (for
test-building we use a gentoo distro which has the file at
$gentoo/usr/include/sys/epoll.h) the test binary should be built
by default (from the corresponding Makefile):
LIBC_HAS_EPOLL := $(shell echo '\#include
' | $(CC) -E - &> /dev/null && echo yes)
CFLAGS += -DLTP_EPOLL_USE_SYS_LIBC
CFLAGS += -I. -DLTP_EPOLL_USE_LIB
LDLIBS += -lepoll
I read this code like "if there is a system epoll, then use it, else
use the lib which should be downloaded".
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"