On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>>> See above discussion. I'm not sure what you mean by 'default' cpuset
>>>> here.
>>> I imagine the 'default' cpuset as the system's default cpuset,
>>> in lieu of any administratively created cpusets and bindings
>>> for the process (inherited or explicit).

>> My opinion is that if we decide that it's important to assign numbered sets
>> to tids we need then to allow cpuset_getid to return multiple ids for

> Maybe there shouldn't be WHICH_PID. Perhaps it should be called
> WHICH_ALLTIDS. Then it might appear more expected if
> cpuset_getid(WHICH_ALLTIDS, ...) returned multiple cpusets.
> I realize this is just playing with words, and I do prefer

Are there any objections to commiting this functionality in its current

I think there is the possibility for further debate and refinement but I
believe the code is stable and simple enough to hit the tree for people to
start using it.


> --
> DE

freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"