On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Pete French wrote:

> > Since the program as defined above does not include any prototype for
> > atof(), its return value is assumed to be int. The i386 code for the
> > comparison is therefore:

>
> Sorry, I didn't bother sticking the include lines in when I sent it to
> the mailing list as I assumed it would be ovious that you need to
> include the prototypes!


I have fixed obscure problems caused by my idiotic predecessors failing to
include the relevant headers...

-- Dave
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"