Re: Float problen running i386 inary on amd64
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Pete French wrote:
> > Since the program as defined above does not include any prototype for
> > atof(), its return value is assumed to be int. The i386 code for the
> > comparison is therefore:[/color]
> Sorry, I didn't bother sticking the include lines in when I sent it to
> the mailing list as I assumed it would be ovious that you need to
> include the prototypes![/color]
I have fixed obscure problems caused by my idiotic predecessors failing to
include the relevant headers...
[email]email@example.com[/email] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"