This is a discussion on Re: numbers don't lie ... - FreeBSD ; Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Danny Braniss writes: >> Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and: >> >> SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz K8-class CPU) >> one 70g sata disk >> DELL 2950: Intel(R) ...
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Danny Braniss
>> Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
>> SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz K8-class CPU)
>> one 70g sata disk
>> DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.98-MHz K8-class CPU)
>> 4 sata disks + raid0
>> they both run identical 6.1-STABLE.
>> my 'cpu benchmark' shows the amd being much better than the intel.
>> but, doing a make buildworld give interesting results:
>> dell-2950 : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m17.41s real 1h3m3.26s user 17m15.07s sys
>> dell-2950 : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m8.28s real 1h2m59.38s user 16m16.20s sys
>> sunfire : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m21.38s real 49m6.68s user 14m22.64s sys
>> sunfire : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 23m47.69s real 48m53.58s user 13m44.81s sys
>> which probably says something about my 'cpu benchmark' :-(
>> but why is the user time so much different between the boxes?
> I don't see what's so surprising. User time reflects time actually
> spent compiling stuff; you can see there that the Opteron is much
> faster than the Xeon. Sys time is time spent executing kernel code on
> behalf of the build, which is mostly time spent processing I/O
> requests (but does not include time spent actually reading from or
> writing to disks).
> The reason why there is no significant difference in wall time between
> the two is that buildworld is mostly bound by I/O and memory
> bandwidth, not by CPU power. If you have enough memory, place
> /usr/src and /usr/obj on malloc()-backed RAM disks and see if it makes
> any difference.
The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' + 'sys'.
But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I
got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user' time is somewhat
meaningless (i.e. unreliable as a measure) in a multi-CPU and/or hyperthreading
environment. Can you clarify?
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"