On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:

> ZFS volume? You mean ZVOL? Can you paste 'zfs list; zpool status'?



Sorry, not a ZVOL, that's been an unfortunate usage of "volume". I
created a single pool
with all the disks, and I've created ZFS filesystems for /, /var, /
usr...


Of course I can
prueba# zpool status
pool: pool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
da1s2c ONLINE 0 0 0
da2s2c ONLINE 0 0 0
da3s2c ONLINE 0 0 0
da4s2c ONLINE 0 0 0
da5s2c ONLINE 0 0 0
da6s2c ONLINE 0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

prueba# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pool 30.8G 231G 46.0K /pool
pool/expert 36.0K 231G 36.0K /expert
pool/home 461K 231G 461K /home
pool/root 385M 231G 385M legacy
pool/scratch 16.8G 231G 16.8G /pool/scratch
pool/swap 32.0K 243G 32.0K -
pool/usr 1.63G 231G 1.63G /usr
pool/var 52.2M 231G 52.2M /var
prueba#




If you want me to do some tests, I'm available.


Best regards,






Borja.

----------------
"The thing he realised about the windows was this: because they had
been converted into openable windows after they had first been
designed to be impregnable, they were, in fact, much less secure than
if they had been designed as openable windows in the first place."
Douglas Adams, "Mostly Harmless"



_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"