This is a discussion on Re: Cluster Filesystem for FreeBSD - any interest? - FreeBSD ; yf-263 wrote: > =E5=9C=A8 2005-06-22=E4=B8=89=E7=9A=84 07:09 -0500=EF=BC=8CEric Anderso= n=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >=20 >>Allan Fields wrote: >> >>>On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:35:56AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: >>> >>> >>>>This is something I've brought up before on other lists, but I'm curi= ...
> =E5=9C=A8 2005-06-22=E4=B8=89=E7=9A=84 07:09 -0500=EF=BC=8CEric Anderso=
>>Allan Fields wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:35:56AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
>>>>This is something I've brought up before on other lists, but I'm curi=
>>>>if anyone is interested in developing a BSD licensed clustered=20
>>>>filesystem for FreeBSD (and anyone else)?
>>>A few questions:
>>>Could this be done as a stackable file system (vnode layer distributed=
>>>file system) or did you have something else in mind (i.e. specifically=
>>>a full implementation of a network filesystem including storage
>>Hmm. I'm not sure if it can or not. I'll try to explain what I'm=20
>>dreaming of. I currently have about 1000 clients needing access to the=
> This is exactly what we are doing now but only a proof-of-concept
> Now it has a asymmetric arch, i.e. a client, some metadata server, and
> some filedata server.
> thanks for your professional description as what we are target to
>>same pools of data (read/write) all the time. The data changes=20
>>constantly. There is a lot of this data. We use NFS currently.=20
>>FreeBSD is *very* fast and stable at serving NFS data. The problem is,=
>>that even though it is very fast and stable, I still cannot pump out=20
>>enough bits fast enough with one machine, and if that one machine fails=
>>(hardware problems, etc), then all my machines are hung waiting for me =
>>to bring it back online.
>>So, what I would love to have, is this kind of setup: shared media=20
>>storage (fibre channel SAN, iscsi, or something like ggated possibly), =
>>connected up to a cluster of hosts running FreeBSD. Each FreeBSD serve=
>>has access to the logical disks, same partitions, and can mount them al=
>>r/w. Now, I can kind of do this now, however there are obviously some =
>>issues with this currently. I want all machines in this cluster to be =
>>able to serve the data via NFS (or http, or anything else for that=20
>>matter really - if you can make NFS work, anything will pretty much=20
>>work) simultaneously from the same partitions, and see writes=20
>>immediately as the other hosts in the cluster commit them.
>>I currently have a solution just like this for Linux - Polyserve=20
>>(http://www.polyserve.com) has a clustered filesystem for linux, that=20
>>works very well. I've even tried to convince them to port it to=20
>>FreeBSD, but it falls on deaf ears, so it's time to make our own.
>>>Why not a port of an existing network filesystem say from Linux?
>>>(A BSD rewrite could be done, if the code was GPLed.) Would
>>>cross-platform capabilities make sense?
>>That would work fine I'm sure - but I have found some similar threads i=
>>the past that claim it would be just as hard and time consuming to port=
>>one as it would be to create one from scratch. Cross platform=20
>>capabilities would be great, but I'm mostly interested in getting=20
>>FreeBSD into this arena (as it will soon be an extremely important one =
>>to be in).
>>>How do you see this comparing to device-level solutions? I know
>>>the argument can be made to implement file systems/storage
>>>abstractions at multiple layers, but I thought I might ask.
>>I'm not sure of a device level solution that does this. I think the OS=
>>has to know to commit the meta-data to a journal, or otherwise let the =
>>other machines know about locking, etc, in order for this to work.
>>>The other thing is there a wealth of filesystem papers out there,
>>>any in specific caught your eye?
>>No - can you point me to some?
>>I'll be honest here - I'm not a code developer. I would love to learn =
>>some C here, and 'just do it', but filesystems aren't exactly simple, s=
>>I'm looking for a group of people that would love to code up something =
>>amazing like this - I'll support the developers and hopefully learn=20
>>something in the process. My goal personally would be to do anything I=
>>could to make the developers work most productively, and do testing. I=
>>can probably provide equipment, and a good testbed for it.
You've mentioned this a few times before - is this something you will be =
offering publicly sometime soon?
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"