This is a discussion on Re: linux-org-libs port downloading - FreeBSD ; On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:32:56 -0400 Ben Korvemaker wrote: > > > It's probably all my fault. [...] > > Seems that the "-p" option for portupgrade ...
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:32:56 -0400 Ben Korvemaker wrote:
> > It's probably all my fault.
> Seems that the "-p" option for portupgrade did it...
Ah. Yep. My fault. I like to build binary packages, not for
distribution, but for those occaisional times where it's useful to go
back in time to quickly test a previous version when something goes
> We use linux libraries and as to GPL we should have sources together
> with binaries. It was agreed that the best be can do -- to download
> sources to those servers which have binary distfiles to
> distribute. Thus those sources are downloading only when
> PACKAGE_BUIULDING=YES is defined -- mainly for the FreeBSD package
> building cluster.
> So when a standard user installs linux-xorg-libs from port or from
> package (s)he doesn't get the sources.
> Fedora Core 4 has many xorg-libraries splitted functionally, but has
> only one big file for the sources. :-(
> To avoid the sources fetching you may apply the next patch to
Is the current situation likely to change? Or will I have to keep
that patched? (and won't that patch get blown away every time i cvsup?)
> But you should read GPL first. ;-)
Ben Korvemaker Eagles may soar, but weasels don't
firstname.lastname@example.org get sucked into jet engines.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"