This is a discussion on Re: which make in freebsd? - FreeBSD ; --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > rob spellberg writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > > gmake is inferior in most ways that matter. > ...
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> rob spellbergwrites:
> > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > > gmake is inferior in most ways that matter.
> > why?
>=20
> Most noticeably, the lack of .for / .endfor.
No equivalent for .USE, at least the last time I looked, is a pain.
cf. http://www.daemonnews.org/199907/managing.html
N
--=20
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__)
FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',)
\/ \=
^
--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/=
_)
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/pskak6gHZCw343URAooeAJ46YcIjOBVfLlvlmpCg5VHuUo5M0w CfRho+
Lvc+RLwZB3E0Qib36zYd48Y=
=pbHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--