Re: New "timeout" api, to replace callout
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>Does this mean that you're planning a so-called tickless
Time permitting, yes.
First order of business is getting the API introduced, then to clean
up the places where the 20-line hack for cleaning up callouts has
happened, and them move on in natural order from there.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email]phk@FreeBSD.ORG[/email] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
[email]email@example.com[/email] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"