In message <20060528.113724.1655407378.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes
:

>Why we can't do as I suggested earlier and just make /dev/console a
>pseudo-pipe that is fed from #2 and #4 and that has a well documented
>'other end interface' for things like xconsole. that would simulate
>the historical usage of /dev/console well.


We probably _can_ do that, but it would be easier to teach syslogd
about accept connections from processes interested in subscribing
to events.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"