This is a discussion on Re: Bridges - FreeBSD ; --nextPart1683708.da5CxqY0eD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:22, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-Sep-24 15:25:06 +0200, Max Laier wrote: > >for some time now, we have three bridge implementations in the tree: > ...
On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:22, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-Sep-24 15:25:06 +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> >for some time now, we have three bridge implementations in the tree:
> > - net/bridge.c - the "old" bridge
> > - net/if_bridge.c - the "new" bridge from Net/OpenBSD
> > - netgraph/ng_bridge.c - the netgraph version 
> >The new code has several advantages over the old version:
> > - Spanning Tree Protocol (802.1D)
> > - better firewall support (IPv6, stateful filtering, ...)
> > - easy ifconfig(8) configuration
> Since I've recently needed it, neither bridge.c nor if_bridge.c allow
> you to bridge VLAN trunks (you can bridge individual VLANs but that
> becomes unwieldly when you have dozens of VLANs). I have code to do
> this in bridge.c.
Not sure what you mean, but I am sure Andrew Thompson is willing to help=20
converting your code to if_bridge if asked. BTW, forgot about one big plus=
for if_bridge: It is the one true bridge implementation in Net/OpenBSD so=20
there is a lot of additional "developer power" behind it. Of course one=20
could argue that code monoculture is a bad thing ... I like to believe=20
> >and would have to do it twice, for example) I would like to retire the o=
> >bridge code soon. This should happen in HEAD only and thus the old brid=
> >will stay for all of FreeBSD 6 unless more aggressive depreciation is
> Since if_bridge.c does not exist in FreeBSD 5, and there has not
> previously been any suggestion that bridge.c is deprecated, I would
> object to the removal of bridge.c from FreeBSD 6 since this would
> violate the standard deprecation cycle.
No idea what the standard deprecation cycle is, but no problem. I just wan=
it out of HEAD to be able to move forward with other projects more easily,=
such as what Andre is going to do.
> >Please test the new alternative if you are using the old one still.
> Has anyone looked at how difficult it would be to get if_bridge.c to
> work in 5.x?
See http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ for patches.
/"\ Best regards, | firstname.lastname@example.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----