On Wednesday 02 March 2005 12:17 am, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:10:19PM +0900, Sangwoo Shim wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > In message <200503011650.j21GoI7o018125@peedub.jennejohn.org>,
> > > Gary Jennejohn w
> > >
> > > rites:
> > > >Sangwoo Shim writes:
> > > >> Mpd is likely to be used by FreeBSD (and might DFBSD)
> > > >> exclusively. So, how about import mpd into the base tree? Is
> > > >> there any stopper to prevent mpd from being included into the
> > > >> tree?
> > > >
> > > >Why? /usr/sbin/ppp supports PPPoE just fine and is already in
> > > > the base.
> > >
> > > They should be merged.
> > >
> > > mpd-netgraph has functionality missing in the ppp in the base
> > > system.

> >
> > Exactly my opinion. I'm glad to know you think like that!
> > Hmm, I'm curious whether there is any commiter planning mpd import.

>
> He said 'merged', as in 'combined into one program instead of having
> two (three, including pppd) separate ppp implementations that do
> almost the same thing'.


By the way, I think the time has come for pppd/chat/if_ppp.c to leave
the base and go back to being a 3rd party port.
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"