This is a discussion on Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco ASA and FWSM - Firewalls ; --===============0735802094== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235" ------=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Not completely accurate. Obviously there is the hardware differences between them (such as one being a module which can save rack space) and the other asa or ...
--===============0735802094==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235"
------=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Not completely accurate. Obviously there is the hardware differences
between them (such as one being a module which can save rack space) and the
other asa or pix is an appliance. The main advantage of the fwsm is the
throughput as these are directly connected to the backplane of the layer 3
switches. Their are subtle other differences but this is the main one that
I can think of off the top of my head without going to the cisco site.
hope this helps
Kevin
On 4/25/07, Avishai Woolwrote:
>
> AFAIK the FWSM is essentially a PIX 7.x that is stuck inside a
> catalyst switch chassis. and an ASA is a PIX 7.x that is
> bundled with some other (non-firewall) security functions .
>
> the configuration language was 99.9% compatible between the ASA
> and the FWSM, at least as of PIX 7.0. I'm not sure if Cisco kept the
> code-bases evolving in sync - there were a few months in which FWSM was
> shipping but PIX 7.0 was not released yet...
>
> In my opinion, the main differences are "form factor" and pricing. If
> all you need
> is a firewall then you don't care about the other things the ASA may do.
> If you already have a Catalyst with an empty expansion bay - it may
> be convenient to get a FWSM (e.g. less rack-space).
>
> HTH,
> Avishai
>
> On 4/13/07, Kimberly Fieldswrote:
> > Can anyone tell me what, if any, are the differences between the Cisco
> ASA
> > firewall features and the Cisco FWSM firewall features?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > firewall-wizards mailing list
> > firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
> > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailma...rewall-wizards
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Avishai Wool, Ph.D., Cell: +972-52-333-0052
> Co-founder and Chief Technical Officer
> http://www.algosec.com
> ******* Firewall Management Made Smarter ******
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
> https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailma...rewall-wizards
>
------=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Not completely accurate. Obviously there is the hardware differences between them (such as one being a module which can save rack space) and the other asa or pix is an appliance. The main advantage of the fwsm is the throughput as these are directly connected to the backplane of the layer 3 switches. Their are subtle other differences but this is the main one that I can think of off the top of my head without going to the cisco site.
hope this helps
KevinOn 4/25/07, Avishai Wool <yash@acm.org> wrote:
AFAIK the FWSM is essentially a PIX 7.x that is stuck inside a
catalyst switch chassis. and an ASA is a PIX 7.x that is
bundled with some other (non-firewall) security functions .
the configuration language was
99.9% compatible between the ASA
and the FWSM, at least as of PIX 7.0. I'm not sure if Cisco kept the
code-bases evolving in sync - there were a few months in which FWSM was
shipping but PIX 7.0 was not released yet...
In my opinion, the main differences are "form factor" and pricing. If
all you need
is a firewall then you don't care about the other things the ASA may do.
If you already have a Catalyst with an empty expansion bay - it may
be convenient to get a FWSM (e.g. less rack-space).
HTH,
Avishai
On 4/13/07, Kimberly Fields <kimberlymfields@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what, if any, are the differences between the Cisco ASA
> firewall features and the Cisco FWSM firewall features?
>
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
>
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
> https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
>
--
Avishai Wool, Ph.D., Cell: +972-52-333-0052
Co-founder and Chief Technical Officer
http://www.algosec.com
******* Firewall Management Made Smarter ******
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
------=_Part_28279_13656829.1177686384235--
--===============0735802094==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailma...rewall-wizards
--===============0735802094==--