-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 lordchariot@earthlink.net wrote:

>
> What about when IPv6 becomes predominant on the net?
> Am I mistaken that there doesn't seem to be any concept of NAT in the IPv6
> specs?
> I could be wrong, but thought I found that somewhere?
>



NATs not the issue with IPv6, retirement will have happened for all here
long before this happens by all appearances.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
- --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629

....We waste time looking for the perfect lover
instead of creating the perfect love.

-Tom Robbins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC6AU2st+vzJSwZikRAljkAKDb/QV8xtkwh49zRuLHpx/MqeOKVwCfY3QQ
pkhxy6GjBVGRvsq38JJYo4k=
=fRtw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/li...rewall-wizards