Kernel update to 2.6.x.x, do we need a glibc update? - Embedded
This is a discussion on Kernel update to 2.6.x.x, do we need a glibc update? - Embedded ; Hi, currently we are running a 2.4.26 Linux kernel on an embedded PPC machine and a corresponding glibc 2.2.5. Everything works fine. Now we want to upgrade to a Linux kernel 2.6.x.x. Do we have to recompile our glibc with ...
| | LinkBack | Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| currently we are running a 2.4.26 Linux kernel on an embedded PPC machine and a corresponding glibc 2.2.5. Everything works fine. Now we want to upgrade to a Linux kernel 2.6.x.x. Do we have to recompile our glibc with updated header files? Or is the system call interface of the 2.6.x.x backwards compatible to the system call interface of a 2.4.x kernel? We want to keep the currently used glibc if possible. Thanx and kind regards |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Rainer Wank wrote: > Hi, > > currently we are running a 2.4.26 Linux kernel on an embedded PPC > machine and a corresponding glibc 2.2.5. Everything works fine. > > Now we want to upgrade to a Linux kernel 2.6.x.x. > Do we have to recompile our glibc with updated header files? > Or is the system call interface of the 2.6.x.x backwards compatible to > the system call interface of a 2.4.x kernel? > We want to keep the currently used glibc if possible. Yes, see Changes in kernel 2.6.x source/Documentation/ tree |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| root wrote: > Rainer Wank wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> currently we are running a 2.4.26 Linux kernel on an embedded PPC >> machine and a corresponding glibc 2.2.5. Everything works fine. >> >> Now we want to upgrade to a Linux kernel 2.6.x.x. >> Do we have to recompile our glibc with updated header files? >> Or is the system call interface of the 2.6.x.x backwards compatible to >> the system call interface of a 2.4.x kernel? >> We want to keep the currently used glibc if possible. > > > Yes, see Changes in kernel 2.6.x source/Documentation/ tree > Can you please eplain your YES? You are of the opinion that the glibc has to be recompiled? Why? (maybe they do not want to use new features like NPTL, ...) kind regards quitschn |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bug#497323: Kernel update should update m-a created modules too | unix | Debian | 0 | 08-31-2008 09:40 PM |
| [RFC] kernel update to 2.6.26 | unix | Debian | 0 | 08-02-2008 05:20 PM |
| Re: freebsd-update ignores /boot/kernel/kernel sometimes!? | unix | FreeBSD | 0 | 03-01-2007 10:29 PM |
| Re: freebsd-update ignores /boot/kernel/kernel sometimes!? | unix | FreeBSD | 0 | 03-01-2007 10:57 AM |
| freebsd-update ignores /boot/kernel/kernel sometimes!? | unix | FreeBSD | 0 | 02-28-2007 10:50 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:51 AM.
