On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, bert hubert wrote:
> That is one other problem of DNSSEC - it is absorbing most of the 'brain
> cycles' of DNSEXT members. Non-DNSSEC drafts struggle to get enough
> attention, even those which would have an immediate positive influence on
> DNS security.

Agree. There are a lot of (IMHO, more) pressing problems with DNS,
such as writing an understandable basic specification (think of 'DNS
implementation requirements') so that 98% of vendors don't get it
wrong (or miss important features, e.g., the cache poisoning
validaton) in one way or the other.

Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.