On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, bert hubert wrote:
> That is one other problem of DNSSEC - it is absorbing most of the 'brain
> cycles' of DNSEXT members. Non-DNSSEC drafts struggle to get enough
> attention, even those which would have an immediate positive influence on
> DNS security.


Agree. There are a lot of (IMHO, more) pressing problems with DNS,
such as writing an understandable basic specification (think of 'DNS
implementation requirements') so that 98% of vendors don't get it
wrong (or miss important features, e.g., the cache poisoning
validaton) in one way or the other.

--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: