This is a discussion on Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool - DNS ; Wouter Wijngaards wrote: > Issue [4.1] > DNAMEs can be used as indirections, the goal of these indirections is > to mirror a part of the DNS domain tree in another part of the DNS > domain tree. This mirroring ...
Wouter Wijngaards wrote:
> Issue [4.1]
> DNAMEs can be used as indirections, the goal of these indirections is
> to mirror a part of the DNS domain tree in another part of the DNS
> domain tree. This mirroring should be easy. Alternative wording is
> that the goal is to have an alias name for a part of the domain tree.
> Running example is x DNAME y. The extra point here is that the
> mirroring is done at exactly a delegation point. There is a use for
> this case.
> Can, should, must DNAME be used as a delegation tool? And how is this
> possible according to protocol?
To avoid terminology pollution/erosion, I'd rather not re-define the term
'delegation' here. Delegation is tightly bound to making a zone cut and
separating out control over a well defined part of the name space to
a third (not necessarily) party. Delegations are something that (should)
happen transparently to the user.
So, as an approximation, 'registration tool' might be a better term.
Instead of a delegation, a registry (or anyone in a similar role) could
"alias" a subdomain (not zone!) into a different part of the name space.
I've seen this in the ENUM universe, but Niall may have more detail about this.
OTOH, this is a purely operational matter, so I'm not sure the DNAME
clarifications/update document has anything to say here except what appears
in issue 4.2, i.e., the owner is not covered by the DNAME.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.