[ Moderators note: Post was moderated, either because it was posted by
a non-subscriber, or because it was over 20K.
With the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss and therefore
delete relevant posts by non-subscribers.
Please fix your subscription addresses. ]


--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:18:07PM -0500, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Are there any export or other restrictions on SHA-1 or SHA-256 at this ti=

me?

ISC DHCP is a consumer of this protocol, I see no reason why it can't
adopt SHA-*.

We already have sources we're familiar with which I understand can be
bent to this purpose.


I have no complaints with this compromise.

--=20
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins

--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD6mVycXeLeWu2vmoRAmvZAJ41NFLFgS9/aUOQZ4WtucgXzQqHvACfbchR
DxFE38DcyY0mrj6WU7aYe6k=
=N4kz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur--


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: