--On tirsdag, februar 07, 2006 17:28:54 -0500 "Bernie Volz (volz)"
wrote:

> Well, that certainly would be an easy solution (in terms of changes to
> the draft and also the conflict resolution draft). But, do how practical
> is this? How likely is the IESG to accept this?


(speaking as DHCP-head, not security-head)

would removing the hash entirely increase the probability of confusion over
"who does what"?
I thought it had a differentiation function too....

Harald




--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: