I agree with Alex, but if one algorithm is decided on, I would like it to be
SHA256 at least. SHA1 was scheduled to be phased out from USG use in '09 (I
believe) and replaced with SHA256.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
> [mailtowner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Roy Arends
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 12:11 PM
> To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: nsec3 with one hash algorithm: SHA-224
>
>
> WG,
>
> Rolling hash algorithms (from mandatory to optional) is problematic, as
> was previously shown on this list. Since there is also no real profit in
> supporting more then one algorithm, we can obsolete the algorithm
> field from the RDATA, and settle on a single algorithm for nsec3: SHA-224
> (rfc-3874).
>
> Any comments ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Roy
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive:
>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: