This is a discussion on Re: round-robin question - DNS ; As a long term solution you might want to look at F5's GTM solution if you really want to load balance using DNS. It does exactly what you are looking for but with TONS of bells and whistles. Using a ...
As a long term solution you might want to look at F5's GTM solution if you
really want to load balance using DNS. It does exactly what you are looking
for but with TONS of bells and whistles. Using a standard DNS server to load
balance effectively is a fools errand. You only have control of part of the
conversation and unfortunately the part that you don't have control over is
where the decision is actually made.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Bryan Irvine
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Pounsett
> > On 30-Oct-2008, at 13:34 , Bryan Irvine wrote:
> >> Creative I must admit, but doesn't work. Is there another way to get
> >> this working perhaps with?
> > Even if you can get BIND to hand out more than one identical record (I
> > wouldn't expect that to work), the balance of load is dependant on the
> > clients' algorithms for choosing an A record.. and the clients may not do
> > what you want or expect. Some clients are semi-random, some rotate
> > the A records they get, and some cache and keep the first one they pick.
> Yeah but is it even possible to give more than one identical record?
> > I don't believe there's any reliable way to do this kind of traffic
> > engineering with DNS. If you need to shift load around in very specific
> > ways, then you should look at actual load balancing hardware/software to
> > the job.
> Yeah he really does need a real load balancer. He's just trying this
> as a temporary solution.
Google for President
YouTube for VP
in any year divisible by 4