Fr34k wrote:
> [check-names ( master | slave | response )
> ( warn | fail | ignore ); ]
> This is for 9.5.x
> Not sure what version you have, but now you have something to start from.

RH's 9.3 ... as I noted, I've looked at the docs, but they don't tell you
what is filtered and what isn't and what the differences between
wanr/fail/ignore are.

The docs, as I noted, refer to RFC's 821, 952, and 1123, but those aren't
specific about exactly what is "illegal" and, regardless, don't tell you
what BIND considers "illegal". Some RFC apparently "legalized" underbars,
but it's none of those three.

Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology