> Hello all,
> I would imagine many of you are as concerned as I about the Illinois
> court order
> (http://www.spamhaus.org/archive/lega...order_6_10.pdf) that
> threatens to rescind Spamhaus's domain name via ICANN. As the operator
> of a small but significant (to my clients, at any rate) resolving
> nameserver, what can I change in my configuration in order to keep
> spamhaus.org resolving? Is something as kludgy as a source patch
> required to override resolution of a domain, or can I do something fancy
> with my configuration? Ideally there is something I can do to my
> nameserver that will have the same effect on resolution for my clients
> that a change to my hosts file would have on my own box.
> I hope for the sake of my inbox that I'm not the only one contemplating
> such solutions...
> -andy

Use the datafeed setup http://www.spamhaus.org/datafeed/index.html
Or find some other people to do this together with..
Beware of the memory the server needs ( > 512 Mb)

Andy Getz writes:

> Hello all,
> I would imagine many of you are as concerned as I about the Illinois
> court order
> (http://www.spamhaus.org/archive/lega...order_6_10.pdf) that
> threatens to rescind Spamhaus's domain name via ICANN. As the operator
> of a small but significant (to my clients, at any rate) resolving
> nameserver, what can I change in my configuration in order to keep
> spamhaus.org resolving? ...

fwiw, spamhaus.org.uk also works, and is not subject to US court orders.
--
ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email training@isc.org.
--
Paul Vixie

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:42:58PM +0000,
Paul Vixie wrote
a message of 17 lines which said:

> fwiw, spamhaus.org.uk also works, and is not subject to US court orders.

Of course, it is, "spamhaus.org.uk." depends on "co.uk." which depends
on "uk." which depends on "." which depends on the US governement, as
well as "org."

But we are drifting away from BIND :-)

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:42:58PM +0000,
> Paul Vixie wrote
> a message of 17 lines which said:
>
>
>>fwiw, spamhaus.org.uk also works, and is not subject to US court orders.
>
>
> Of course, it is, "spamhaus.org.uk." depends on "co.uk." which depends
> on "uk." which depends on "." which depends on the US governement, as
> well as "org."
>
> But we are drifting away from BIND :-)
>
>

There is a root zonefile at

http://intlnet.org/intlroot.txt
http://afrac.org/intlroot.txt

>> L'AFRAC est un centre en ligne national de référentiels contextuels.
>> Son rôle est la mise à disposition indépendante, documentée et
>> personnalisée des racines et des données de référence nécessaires à
>> une pleine interopération nationale, sûre et protégée, des systèmes
>> d'information, des relations et des services numériques.

)) AFRAC is a national online centre for contextual reference
)) Its role is to provide independent and documented data about
)) the roots to allow complete interoperation nationally
)) of information systems and digital relations


you can use it to run your own rootserver - just in case

I hope I did translate the text correctly.

And Paul might suggest the ORSN servers who generate their own
root zonefile without believing everything "rootservers.net" says.

Kind regards
Peter and Karin

--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49(6252)671-788 (Telekom)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: peter@peter-dambier.de
mail: peter@echnaton.serveftp.com
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
http://www.cesidianroot.com/

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> But we are drifting away from BIND :-)

Not drifting, pole vaulted past it. There are plenty of other venues
for political commentary.

Doug

--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:29:09PM +0200,
Peter Dambier wrote
a message of 57 lines which said:

> There is a root zonefile at
>
> http://intlnet.org/intlroot.txt

A wonderful SOA. Do not miss it :-)

.. IN SOA A.INTLNET.ORG. INTL.INTLNET.ORG. (
20061011022550 ;serial

> I hope I did translate the text correctly.

Yes, it is perfect. The text makes no sense in French and you rendered
this lack of meaning faithfully.