> -----Original Message-----
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:38 AM
> To: Vinny Abello
> Cc: bind-users@isc.org
> Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
> At Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:26:04 -0400,
> Vinny Abello wrote:
> > Huh... maybe I was right in the first place. I left dnsperf running
> > and named ran out of memory. In my syslog I had a lot of these
> > swap_pager_getswapspace failed messages followed by named finally
> > dying (again, FreeBSD 7.0 STABLE AMD64, 4GB of RAM and the only
> > software running is really BIND).

> Quick questions: did you enable threads? If so, does that change if
> you disable threads? We've heard a similar report on a beta version
> of 9.5.0 for FreeBSD, which reportedly only happened with enabling
> threads (and only happened with 9.5, not 9.4). I've tried to
> reproduce it with a mostly equivalent setting of OS/hardware, but
> never succeeded in seeing it by myself.

Yes, threads are enabled. I can try it with threads disabled and see if there is a difference. This is just a stock FreeBSD 7.0 system with BIND 9.5.0-P2 from ports. I'm not doing anything weird that I know of. Again, it also seems to happen on Windows, but as I understand, the ISC provided binary kit for Windows is threaded also, correct? I guess that could be the key. I will recompile without threads now and retest.