Ben Laurie wrote:
> Duane wrote:
>> Ben Laurie wrote:
>>
>>>> Beats me, everyone seems rather concerned over an issue that no one
>>>> could fix if they wanted to in any case. That isn't to say that someone
>>>> shouldn't be doing in terms of getting NAT better for in future, but
>>>> existing deployments by and large are never going to be upgraded until
>>>> new hardware is purchased.
>>> Whether that's true or not, isn't it a good idea that the new hardware
>>> actually does the right thing?

>>
>> I already suggested that, but apparently NAT needs to be fixed as much
>> as DNS in new hardware.

>
> Exactly.


Ok, so problem solved as far as I can see, someone just needs to tell
hardware companies to fix NAT + DNS and that's that.

--

Best regards,
Duane

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: