Ben Laurie wrote:

>> Beats me, everyone seems rather concerned over an issue that no one
>> could fix if they wanted to in any case. That isn't to say that someone
>> shouldn't be doing in terms of getting NAT better for in future, but
>> existing deployments by and large are never going to be upgraded until
>> new hardware is purchased.

>
> Whether that's true or not, isn't it a good idea that the new hardware
> actually does the right thing?


I already suggested that, but apparently NAT needs to be fixed as much
as DNS in new hardware.

--

Best regards,
Duane

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: