Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution for NATs
Masataka Ohta wrote:[color=blue]
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>>> What? Resolvers behind NAT/PAT are directly talking to authoritative
>> Why not?[/color]
> Because various NAT/PAT gateways put all the possible and impossible
> modificaitons on certain, including DNS, packets that there is virtually
> no directness expected.[/color]
I can't really parse this. What do you mean by "directness"? And what
possible/impossible modifications to NAT/PAT gateways make to packets?
>> And on the question of NAT randomness: [url]http://www.links.org/?p=352[/url].[/color]
> That is one, among so many, example of indirectness of NAT.[/color]
Source port modification, you mean?
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
to unsubscribe send a message to [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.