Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution for NATs
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:06:08AM +0100, [email]Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk[/email] wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > I'm surprised no one mentioned IPv6 since we're on this soap box.[/color]
> That would be nice, but AFAIK my own test environment (which uses rp-pppoe
> and pppd as a DSL BRAS) isn't capable of doing IPv6.[/color]
some folks have a hard time seeing boxen of that ilk as being
routers. stripped down NAT, sure.
so as long as you and your US researcher are clear that you are looking
at "settop boxes" ... then I have no problems.
but if you start building a punchlist of desired characteristics that
are missing, then you'll be getting any number of feature requests.
if one is after EDNS0 support, then dealing w/ UDP fragmentation will
be an issue -unless- the device in question can handle 4k UDP frames.
"rewriting" DNS queries will muck w/ DNSSEC signed data.
etc.etc. good luck.
to unsubscribe send a message to [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.