dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT results are POOR with Bind 9.5.0-P1 - DNS

This is a discussion on dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT results are POOR with Bind 9.5.0-P1 - DNS ; Bind 9.5.0-P1 # dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b. a.pt.dns-oarc.net. "x.x.x.x is POOR: 26 queries in 0.8 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00" I installed Bind 9.5.0-P1 and made sure that the config files don't restrict query-source to port ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT results are POOR with Bind 9.5.0-P1

  1. dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT results are POOR with Bind 9.5.0-P1

    Bind 9.5.0-P1
    # dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
    z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b. a.pt.dns-oarc.net.
    "x.x.x.x is POOR: 26 queries in 0.8 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00"

    I installed Bind 9.5.0-P1 and made sure that the config files don't restrict query-source to port 53.

    However, porttest.dns-oarc.net reports that queries are still accepted by only one port.

    I checked with my NOC and they assured me that they are not blocking UDP ports > 1024.

    This is a Caching Only DNS server.

    Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

    Jim
    -----
    Jim Hermann
    UUism Networks
    Ministering to the Needs of Online UUs
    Web Hosting, Email Services, Mailing Lists
    -----
    Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


  2. Re: dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT results are POOR with Bind 9.5.0-P1

    a
    "UUN Hostmaster" writes:

    > Bind 9.5.0-P1
    > # dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
    > z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b. a.pt.dns-oarc.net.
    > "x.x.x.x is POOR: 26 queries in 0.8 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00"
    >...
    > This is a Caching Only DNS server.
    >
    > Any idea what I'm doing wrong?


    what does "traceroute -q1 149.20.58.126" say?
    --
    Paul Vixie

    --
    This message has been scanned for viruses and
    dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
    believed to be clean.



+ Reply to Thread