This is a discussion on RE: Number of CPUs detected by Bind 9.4.2 on 4 CPU system running RedHat es 4. - DNS ; Did you reboot the box at some point? Typically on the older boxes during install it would build both an SMP kernel and a non-SMP kernel. During boot grub would default to one kernel or another but give you the ...
Did you reboot the box at some point?
Typically on the older boxes during install it would build both an SMP
kernel and a non-SMP kernel. During boot grub would default to one
kernel or another but give you the opportunity to interrupt the boot and
pick the kernel. If you interrupted boot then told it to boot from the
kernel that doesn't have smp at the end of its name you're not doing
multi-processor. The fix for this is simply to reboot and be sure you
are booting from the smp kernel.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On
Behalf Of greg kuechle
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Number of CPUs detected by Bind 9.4.2 on 4 CPU system
running RedHat es 4.
I didn't upgrade the kernel. The kernel supports multiple CPUs. The only
thing that I upgraded was named. I built it from the souce code.The
version that came with the RedHat OS as a package uses all of the CPUs,
when I compile named on the system it will only see 1 CPU.
When I compile and run the following code:
printf("ncpus: %d\n" , sysconf((_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN))):
The result is:
There seems to be a problem with the way the 9.4.2 code is getting built
my RedHat systems.
I compiled using the following:
$INSTALL_DIR/configure --prefix=/opt/named --with-openssl
I have three other servers that have the same problem. They are all
These are production servers, so I require the use of all of the CPUs.
I also tryed starting named without the -n switch and only one CPU is
detected and one worker thread is started.
Thanks for any Help.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 31.03.08 11:59, greg kuechle wrote:
> > I have install bind 9.4.2 on a system with 4 CPUs running RedHat
> > compiled named with the --enable-threads and used the -n 4 flag
> > start named.
> > Mar 31 10:12:24 ******** named: starting BIND 9.4.2 -t
> > -u named -n 4 -c /etc/named.conf
> > Mar 31 16:12:24 ******** named: found 1 CPU, using 4 worker
> does your kernel support more CPUs? Seems it does not. Maybe you
> re-compile or use another (SMP) kernel.
> > Before I upgraded the system it was running an older version of
> > comes packaged with the OS.
> > Here is the output from the logfile.
> > Mar 24 11:34:13 ******** named: starting BIND 9.2.4
> > Mar 24 11:34:13 ******** named: using 4 CPUs
> seems named found 4 CPUs here... you had SMP kernel before the
> > Did I compile named wrong?
> the kernel, not the named, imho.
> > Will BIND 9.4.2 use all of the CPUs if I use the -n 4 option at
> No, named will create 4 threads if you use "-n 4", independently on
> of CPUs in the system. Whether threads will be run on more CPU's,
> completely on the kernel. On single-processor kernel everything will
> just one CPU.
> If you don't use the "-n" switch, named will detect the number of
> and decide itself, how much threads to start. That's recommended and
> > It looks like named is only running on one CPU. Will named start
> > other CPUs once one CPU is up to 100% ?
> I doubt, see above.
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, firstname.lastname@example.org ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.