This is a discussion on Re: Number of CPUs detected by Bind 9.4.2 on 4 CPU system running RedHat es 4. - DNS ; On 31.03.08 11:59, greg kuechle wrote: > I have install bind 9.4.2 on a system with 4 CPUs running RedHat es4. I > compiled named with the --enable-threads and used the -n 4 flag when I > start named. > ...
On 31.03.08 11:59, greg kuechle wrote:
> I have install bind 9.4.2 on a system with 4 CPUs running RedHat es4. I
> compiled named with the --enable-threads and used the -n 4 flag when I
> start named.
> Mar 31 10:12:24 ******** named: starting BIND 9.4.2 -t /opt/named
> -u named -n 4 -c /etc/named.conf
> Mar 31 16:12:24 ******** named: found 1 CPU, using 4 worker threads
does your kernel support more CPUs? Seems it does not. Maybe you should
re-compile or use another (SMP) kernel.
> Before I upgraded the system it was running an older version of named that
> comes packaged with the OS.
> Here is the output from the logfile.
> Mar 24 11:34:13 ******** named: starting BIND 9.2.4
> Mar 24 11:34:13 ******** named: using 4 CPUs
seems named found 4 CPUs here... you had SMP kernel before the upgrade.
> Did I compile named wrong?
the kernel, not the named, imho.
> Will BIND 9.4.2 use all of the CPUs if I use the -n 4 option at startup?
No, named will create 4 threads if you use "-n 4", independently on number
of CPUs in the system. Whether threads will be run on more CPU's, depends
completely on the kernel. On single-processor kernel everything will use
just one CPU.
If you don't use the "-n" switch, named will detect the number of processors
and decide itself, how much threads to start. That's recommended and default.
> It looks like named is only running on one CPU. Will named start using the
> other CPUs once one CPU is up to 100% ?
I doubt, see above.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, firstname.lastname@example.org ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.