RFD: Remove comp.os.rsts - DEC
This is a discussion on RFD: Remove comp.os.rsts - DEC ; REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
Usenet newsgroup:
remove remove comp.os.rsts
RATIONALE: remove comp.os.rsts
This is one of a set of 31 low-traffic former INET groups proposed for
removal. Please ...
-
RFD: Remove comp.os.rsts
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
Usenet newsgroup:
remove remove comp.os.rsts
RATIONALE: remove comp.os.rsts
This is one of a set of 31 low-traffic former INET groups proposed for
removal. Please see the article
"2nd RFD: Remove low traffic former INET groups"
posted to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups for a more general
discussion.
************************************************** ********************************
RATIONALE: remove comp.os.rsts
The newsgroup line is:
|comp.os.rsts Topics related to the PDP-11 RSTS/E operating system.
comp.os.rsts has had 15 on-topic messages in the past 11 months, in 3
threads. Two of the threads were cross-posted to groups such as
vmsnet.pdp-11, alt.sys.pdp11, and comp.sys.dec.
************************************************** ********************************
PROCEDURE:
The full (draft) group removal procedure is documented here:
http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.p...licies:rmgroup
Those who wish to comment on this request to remove this newsgroup
should subscribe to news.groups and participate in the relevant threads
in that newsgroup.
To this end, the followup header of this RFD has been set to
news.groups.
All discussion of active proposals should be posted to news.groups.
If desired by the readership of closely affected groups, the discussion
may be crossposted to those groups, but care must be taken to ensure
that all discussion appears in news.groups as well.
DISTRIBUTION:
news.announce.newgroups (omitted)
news.groups
comp.os.rsts
comp.org.decus
comp.sys.dec
PROPONENT:
Jim Riley
CHANGE HISTORY:
2006-07-08 Original RFD.
--
Jim Riley
-
Re: RFD: Remove comp.os.rsts
[xposted to comp.os.vms,alt.sys.pdp11]
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:09:45 GMT in comp.os.rsts, Jim Riley
wrote:
> REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
>
>This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
>Usenet newsgroup:
>
>remove remove comp.os.rsts
>
>RATIONALE: remove comp.os.rsts
>
>This is one of a set of 31 low-traffic former INET groups proposed for
>removal. Please see the article
>
>"2nd RFD: Remove low traffic former INET groups"
>
>posted to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups for a more general
>discussion.
>
>************************************************** ********************************
>
>RATIONALE: remove comp.os.rsts
>
>The newsgroup line is:
>
>|comp.os.rsts Topics related to the PDP-11 RSTS/E operating system.
>
>comp.os.rsts has had 15 on-topic messages in the past 11 months, in 3
>threads. Two of the threads were cross-posted to groups such as
>vmsnet.pdp-11, alt.sys.pdp11, and comp.sys.dec.
>
>************************************************** ********************************
>
>PROCEDURE:
>
>The full (draft) group removal procedure is documented here:
>
> http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.p...licies:rmgroup
>
>Those who wish to comment on this request to remove this newsgroup
>should subscribe to news.groups and participate in the relevant threads
>in that newsgroup.
>
>To this end, the followup header of this RFD has been set to
>news.groups.
>
>All discussion of active proposals should be posted to news.groups.
>
>If desired by the readership of closely affected groups, the discussion
>may be crossposted to those groups, but care must be taken to ensure
>that all discussion appears in news.groups as well.
>
>DISTRIBUTION:
>
> news.announce.newgroups (omitted)
> news.groups
> comp.os.rsts
> comp.org.decus
> comp.sys.dec
>
>PROPONENT:
>
>Jim Riley
>
>CHANGE HISTORY:
>
>2006-07-08 Original RFD.
--
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Brian.Inglis@CSi.com (Brian[dot]Inglis{at}SystematicSW[dot]ab[dot]ca)
fake address use address above to reply