On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:19:49 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Given how Xen works, a lot of people are not able to change their
>> kernel.

> This is incorrect. There are now two possibilities to use the guest
> supplied kernels and the whole bunch of enterprise distributions never
> really supported it otherwise. One of them can even be considered safe.

Could you please provide pointers to these two possibilities?
And which one is considered safe?

>> IMHO it is a really bad idea to not support Xen kernels from Etch.

> I don't know how. The way the kernel in Etch responds to the problem is
> also not pretty, but this was not really clear at that time of the Etch
> release.

Could you please clarify what's the current (or emerging) best
practice for running Xen with Debian? The latest I know of:

for dom0: Lenny with the Etch kernel
for domU: Lenny

This libc update breaks dom0, and xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686
from unstable doesn't boot for me either. Should it?

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org