3.4 in testing: dependency issues
Hi,
As I'm sure many of you know, KDE 3.4 has arrived in testing. Congratulations
and thanks to the Debian team!
My report:
With my package-set, the new kdeedu and kig packages had unsatisfied
dependencies which meant a full upgrade could not proceed in testing.
With those two packages un-selected for upgrade, the upgrade is able to
proceed, however, apt-get warns that:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
ardour-gtk atlantikdesigner basket hotplug k3b k3blibs kaddressbook-plugins
kaffeine kate-plugins kbear kcmlinuz kde kde-amusements kdeaddons
kdeaddons-kfile-plugins kdeedu kdelibs4 kdewebdev kfilereplace
kicker-applets kig kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kmplayer kommander
konq-plugins ksig kwin-baghira kxdocker kxdocker-data kxsldbg libarts1
libbio2jack0 libjack0.80.0-0 libjack0.80.0-dev libkcal2a libkdenetwork2
libkdepim1 libmimelib1a libmodplug0 libmusicbrainz4 libopenexr2 libqt-perl
libqt3c102-mt libtag1 libtunepimp2 libwv2-1 mplayer-386 noatun-plugins qgo
quanta rosegarden4 vimpart xmms-xmmplayer
Of particular concern for me are ardour, rosegarden4, and basket, which I use
extensively for work; and to a lesser extent k3b, kaffeine, kxdocker and
kwin-baghira, which I like!
I'm very keen to try KDE 3.4 in testing, but not without these programs. Is it
just a matter of waiting until the dependencies are sorted out out fully, or
is there a workaround?
IIRC, the rosegarden4 issue may relate to a dependency on libjack0.80.0-0
which is being replaced by libjack0.100.0-0. Is this correct?
Any info about the status or upgradeabilty of any the above programs would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org[/email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
Re: 3.4 in testing: dependency issues
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 10:14 pm, John O'Hagan wrote:
[color=blue]
> IIRC, the rosegarden4 issue may relate to a dependency on libjack0.80.0-0
> which is being replaced by libjack0.100.0-0. Is this correct?
>
> Any info about the status or upgradeabilty of any the above programs would
> be appreciated.[/color]
Probably just wait. I went through this on Sid already, and it finally got
sorted out after a protracted mess.
I've got everything installed from packages now, I think, except ZynAddSubFX.
I expect this will all trickle into testing in due course, and hopefully
faster than it took for these issues to settle out of Sid.
--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <dmmcintyr@users.sourceforge.net>
[url]http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/[/url]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org[/email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
Re: 3.4 in testing: dependency issues
John O'Hagan wrote:[color=blue]
> As I'm sure many of you know, KDE 3.4 has arrived in testing.
> Congratulations and thanks to the Debian team![/color]
And you know whom to thank for it -- out of sheer desperation from lacking
3.4.2 (and openoffice-kde) I have switched yesterday to sid, which is
always best way how to make testing updated :-)).
Matěj
--
Matej Cepl, [url]http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/[/url]
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
I know of no country in which there is so little independence of
mind and real freedom of discussion as in America.
-- Alexis de Tocqueville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org[/email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]