This is a discussion on Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta - Debian ; Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: > I am not a specialist, but in France, private use of a work cannot be > denied (as well as private copy, in some measure). Whether this applies > only to countries following "author rights" doctrine ...
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> I am not a specialist, but in France, private use of a work cannot be
> denied (as well as private copy, in some measure). Whether this applies
> only to countries following "author rights" doctrine instead of
> "copyrights", I let it to someone more knowledgeable in this field.
It applies to all countries who have implemented EC Directive 91/250/EC
regarding copyright protection for coomputer programs.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...1L0250:EN:HTML
Basic principles
1) use of software is one of the exclusive rights (art. 4(a))
2) uses by a lawful acquirer are deemed not an infringement (art. 5(1))
3) a license may restrict or annul item 2 (art. 5(1) first part)
IOW I don't need a license to run GPL software. If the person who
made the software available to me obeys the GPL, I'm a "lawful
acquirer" and I couldn't care less about what the GPL says.
Only when I redistribute the software do I need to worry about
the GPL provisions.
IANYL, TINLA.
Arnoud
--
Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself
Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org