Why Typewriters Beat Computers - CP/M

This is a discussion on Why Typewriters Beat Computers - CP/M ; TYPEWRIT.TXT ------------ - "Why Typewriters Beat Computers" Neil Hallows BBC News Magazine, 30 May 2008 11:07 UK (Edited by Emmanuel ROCHE.) They're clunky, dirty and can't access the internet, yet every year thousands of people buy typewriters when they could ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Why Typewriters Beat Computers

  1. Why Typewriters Beat Computers


    - "Why Typewriters Beat Computers"
    Neil Hallows
    BBC News Magazine, 30 May 2008 11:07 UK

    (Edited by Emmanuel ROCHE.)

    They're clunky, dirty and can't access the internet, yet every year
    thousands of people buy typewriters when they could probably afford a
    computer. Why?

    When asked how he writes, Frederick Forsyth has a simple answer: "With a

    He admits this is to avoid the more difficult business of describing his
    creative process, but it also means he can celebrate old friends.

    There was the steel-cased portable he used as a foreign correspondent in the
    1960s. "It had a crease across the lid which was done by a bullet in Biafra.
    It just kept tapping away. It didn't need power, it didn't need batteries,
    it didn't need recharging. One ribbon went back and forward and back until
    it was a rag, almost, and out came the dispatches."

    And after 50 years and a dozen novels including "The Day of the Jackal", why
    change now, he asks.

    "I have never had an accident where I have pressed a button and accidentally
    sent seven chapters into cyberspace, never to be seen again. And have you
    ever tried to hack into my typewriter? It is very secure."

    Although he laughs as he says it, Mr Forsyth identifies the continuing
    attraction of a typewriter for thousands of people. They find a computer
    distracting, unreliable or just plain terrifying, and they have a love for
    the tangible. As he puts it, "I like to see black words on white paper
    rolling up in front of my gaze".

    Mr Forsyth's novels are so popular that he could write them in the sand and
    publishers would still queue up for his business. But who else is still
    pounding rather than pressing their keyboard?

    Just as quick

    The Japanese multinational Brother sold 12,000 electronic typewriters last
    year in the UK, which is its biggest market in Europe.

    Brother UK sales director Phil Jones says customers are generally older
    people, although his company also sells a number to students. He says
    typewriters remain a cheap way to develop keyboard skills. The most basic
    model costs around 80.

    "Typewriters are much more straightforward to use than computers as they
    only have one function - typing," says Mr Jones.

    And typing is the only thing that Maureen Huggins wants her machinery to do.

    A reporter for 52 years, she uses a manual typewriter for her work at the
    Norfolk Courts Press Agency. Stories are then faxed to newspapers and

    Mrs Huggins tried using a computer about 15 years ago and the memory is
    still raw. "I had four pages of instructions I had to learn, to send [my
    previous employers] the stories. Then the blooming thing blew up and they
    told me that it was my fault, and it wasn't, it just burnt out."

    She says she can produce her stories at least as quickly as her rivals,
    because the risk of technical failure is virtually nil - she keeps a spare
    typewriter at hand - and because the typewriter encourages her to get the
    story right first time.

    This may sound like an impossibly Spartan ideal, where cut and paste is done
    with scissors and glue, and deleted words remain on the page as angry little
    blobs. But for some left jaded and distracted by their smarty-pants
    computers, it is tempting.

    The writer Will Self is a convert. He went back to using a manual typewriter
    several years ago. "I think the computer user does their thinking on the
    screen, and the non-computer user is compelled, because he or she has to
    retype a whole text, to do a lot more thinking in the head," he said in a
    recent interview.

    That doesn't necessarily mean that Royals and Underwoods are elbowing PCs
    and Macs off the desk with their jabby little carriage return levers. But
    even for the technologically savvy, they have their uses.

    Green screen style

    Richard Polt, a philosophy professor at Xavier University in Cincinnati,
    Ohio, collects old typewriters but is sufficiently computer literate to run
    an attractive website devoted to them. He remembers struggling over a book
    he was writing.

    "There are so many distractions with the internet, it is also so easy to
    change and delete what you have written. It is too easy to dither."

    So he turned to one of his 175 old typewriters.

    "I didn't compose most of the book on a typewriter, but every once in a
    while I would put out a few pages on a typewriter, a first draft, and it was
    kind of refreshing."

    He knows of others, especially in the early stages of creative writing, who
    have benefited in a similar way.

    This can be achieved without a typewriter. The right software can turn the
    flashiest computer display into a technological boot camp - an early 1980s
    green screen stripped of dancing paper clips and easy escape routes to the

    Useful, perhaps, but not beautiful. Turning a computer into a prop from
    "Ashes to Ashes" will never have the aesthetic charm of a Remington
    Noiseless. It is this historical, emotional pull which draws a particular
    kind of student or aspiring writer to the typewriter.

    I don't know why, but they usually seem to be men, and their heroes are
    hard, brilliant men from the last century. Posing on their blogs with an
    antique machine, all that separates them from Hemingway are two dozen
    ****tails and his ability to write.

    Car boot sales

    If there really is a move back to typewriters, it probably won't come in
    time to save what is left of the market.

    Brother UK's Mr Jones admits he is "surprised" that people are still buying
    typewriters, and "amazed" his company sells a handful for more than 500,
    which would buy a laptop. Typewriter sales are falling 10% a year at the
    company, which is better known for its printers, faxes and sewing equipment.

    Perhaps more surprisingly, demand in developing countries is also falling
    sharply. Godrej Industries, an engineering and consumer products
    conglomerate, owns the last manual typewriter factory in India.

    Senior general manager Sorab Barekh says two-thirds are exported, with
    various typefaces, to Africa and South East Asia. They tend to be used by
    remote government outposts which have a poor electricity supply. Sales are
    falling so fast that more than half a century of production might cease
    within three years, he says.

    But for a long time yet, anyone who wants a typewriter will be able to pick
    one up at a car boot sale for roughly the price of a replacement ribbon.

    And even when the last Carriage Return rings, their legacy will go on. The
    "qwerty" keyboard was devised as a means of keeping commonly recurring
    sequences of letters like "th" and "an" apart so typewriter keys did not

    There is argument about whether a different configuration of letters would
    enable faster typing, but an educationalist who tried to change it in the
    last century likened the challenge to reversing the Ten Commandments.

    The biggest inheritance from the typewriter, however, is the fact that lots
    of people reading this at work will be women. Typing classes mushroomed at
    the end of the 19th Century, and this helped many women to enter paid work
    for the first time. By 1901, Britain had 166,000 female clerks, up from
    2,000 half a century before.

    It was a limited emancipation. The new employees (often called
    "type-writers" themselves) were accused of stealing jobs from men,
    depressing wages and sexually tempting the boss, and their chance of career
    progression was often nil. But for women to have any job outside the home
    was revolutionary.

    So, while the pen may be mightier than the sword, the typewriter was once
    mightier than both.


  2. Re: Why Typewriters Beat Computers

    BBC News Magazine

    Below is a selection of your comments:

    I exchanged my mother's 1960 era typewriter only after our neighbours
    complained of the noise at night. Whatever I wrote always seemed to come
    more easily on the typewriter. Although I bought a laptop in its place, I
    find I use the computer for my iPod (and the occasional game of solitaire)
    and write now with a pen & paper. I'd love to get a typewriter again, but
    cannot find them in my area.

    Cathy, West Fargo ND US

    They still make identity cards and drivers' licenses with typewriters in the
    Brussels communes. Computers would probably make things faster and more
    efficient, eliminating precious jobs in this third-world banana republic.

    Sally, Belgium

    Computers are great when they work. I love my laptop and it makes
    communication easier. However, e-mail and instant messaging is obliterating
    the use of the telephone. I e-mail my friends rather than phone them.
    Communication is getting less personal and I can't remember the last time
    someone wrote me a letter. From that perspective I say we should bring back
    the typewriter!

    Justine, Luton

    I was poking around a charity shop a couple of years ago when I saw what
    looked like a very small suitcase. Upon closer inspection I opened it up and
    saw it was a hard plastic case enclosing a typewriter. I thought I'd buy it
    for the novelty value (it was only 10) and took it home. Now, years later,
    I absolutely love my little Adler Tippa and, given the choice of writing
    something on my Macbook or on my Tippa, the Tippa wins (nearly) every time.
    There's something so much more satisfying about printing something directly
    onto a blank sheet, rather than re-organising a few pixels on an electronic

    Ruy, Edinburgh

    I learnt my keyboard skills on an electric typewriter and my speed on a
    computer is around 100 wpm. However, as I am old enough to have been
    properly educated by learning grammar, punctuation, sentence structure,
    spelling, etc., I am capable of composing on-screen without difficulty. I
    love my computer, especially e-mail, and I write my e-mails as if they were
    letters written by hand.

    Susan Smith, Banbury

    A typewriter is handy for envelope printing - most digital printers require
    awkward handling to print an envelope. Also, don't forget the European
    keyboard. AZERTY rather than QWERTY. Once had to use an AZERTY keyboard at a
    client's office for several hours - terrible time of it.

    TM Chambers, Pittsburgh, PA, US

    You're absolutely right, I am a female of a certain age reading this at
    work. I still have my portable manual typewriter, bought 25 years ago and I
    find it particularly useful when filling in forms. Whenever my home computer
    seizes up (which happens fairly frequently) I have my faithful old friend to
    fall back on. Long may the manual typewriter continue.

    Bridget, Ramsgate, UK

    I very much doubt that the typewriter comeback will last long. The hassle of
    having to use paper, not being able to e-mail, storing your documents in
    physical form, and the risk of having to re-type the whole thing if you make
    a mistake or damage the hard copy is just too much in this day and age.
    Especially if you have to compete with someone else using a computer. Spell
    check is also an essential crutch for many.


    Working on a computer means you never have to use Tippex again.

    Janet Parkhurst, Cape Town, South Africa

    I taught myself typing as a child 50 years ago, and over time owned numerous
    antique and modern typewriters. I loved the smell of the ribbon, the sheer
    physical energy and clackety clack of the old machines and the joy of
    cleaning out the lead characters with a toothpick while ruminating. But was
    I relieved with my first computer not to have to retype each time I made an

    Sauce, UK

    I got through undergraduate and Master level courses using a Brothers
    portable. I composed as I typed, and had to really block out my words BEFORE
    I started to put them on paper, which made my stories/papers flow better. I
    also found I was much more concise in my wordage, being a lazy fellow.

    Steve Cowan, Lubbock, TX, US

    I still have a portable brother typewriter, that I bought in 1980, basically
    to type resumes, to apply for jobs, when I came to the US. It is amazing,
    that it has a small footprint, and can work as a laptop. No messing with
    disks, CDs, or floppys, no buying software updates, just one wire runs
    between it and the wall, and you can work it at your own pace, always.

    Neil Razdan, Olney, Maryland, US

    I'm a writer (a newly found 2nd career). I've had a nightmare three years
    ago when my hard drive crashed and realizing that my first book (in both
    languages) could have been zapped. Maybe I should go back to a Selectric II,
    it would be far less stressful than knowing that ANY DAY some stupid,
    crooked hacker could get away with my ideas...

    Lise Lalancette, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada

    I should by typing away at work writing a user guide, but the easy escape
    route to the internet has brought me here instead. Is that irony? Maybe I
    should look that up, after checking my e-mails.

    Cazz, Bristol

    Not to be pedantic, but there is no such thing as "disk defragmentation

    Sam Neal, London

    Some author might say "I never use a computer" but that's not true. If they
    insist on producing hard copy from a typewriter then it just means someone
    else is going to have to transcribe it for them. (How did they think the
    book got transmitted to editors and typeset? Quills? Hot lead? Magic?) Its
    the same with material in the workplace. Its not about "computers" - they're
    producing information, not pieces of paper, and information that's not
    machine readable is useless. Many late model typewriters are actually small
    computers. They're cheaper to make than mechanical typewriters and are more

    Martin, Thousand Oaks, California

    I fell in love with the typewriters when I started learning to type. The
    challenge was to get an even print on the white paper without mistakes. For
    someone like me whose native tongue was not English, added a bit more to the
    challenge. I happened to top my typing institute results at that time. The
    skill I learnt continues to help me in my IT job.

    Sudarshan Rao, London/Bangalore

    Ah, this international conversation would not take place but for the
    plentiful amount of computers connected to the world wide web. And as
    interesting as these chats can be, the volume of them is overwhelming. So
    much information and many opinions are public, but how much of it can we
    process, and how much time do we waste filtering through it? There is no
    going backwards, but it is almost too easy to communicate. Even here I can
    fire off a bit of an opinion that otherwise I would've kept to myself or
    reserved for dinner conversation tonight. I wonder if it was better when it
    actually took considerable effort it took to publish our opinions. We were
    certainly better self-editors then.

    Linda Ruth Carter, Denver, Colorado, US


+ Reply to Thread