davewrote:
> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
www.kame.net (the famous dancing turtle)
www.sixxs.net/main (IP below)
ftp.freebsd.org
HTH, Helmut
This is a discussion on Testing IPv6 - BSD ; I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with? Thanks. Dave Feustel...
I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
Thanks.
Dave Feustel
davewrote:
> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
www.kame.net (the famous dancing turtle)
www.sixxs.net/main (IP below)
ftp.freebsd.org
HTH, Helmut
Helmut Schneiderwrote:
> davewrote:
>
>> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
>> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
>
>
> www.kame.net (the famous dancing turtle)
> www.sixxs.net/main (IP below)
> ftp.freebsd.org
>
> (IP below) HTH, Helmut
That definitely helps! :-)
How do I switch to IPv6 http as suggested by kame?
dave wrote:
> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
>
>
> Thanks.
> Dave Feustel
Many websites about IPv6 have little "you are connecting from ..."
somewhere on their index page - http://www.go6.net/
http://www.ipv6tf.org http://www.ipv6day.org/ http://ww.ipv6.org/
My fave for checking is the venerable dancing kame at
http://www.kame.net/ - if you get the animated turtle you've connected
vi IPv6, if not then you've connected via IPv4.
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/ipv6calc/ will try to do a reverse lookup to
see if your nameserver is properly serving and reversing IPv6 addresses.
davewrites:
> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
When I go to this web page: http://www.ipv6.org/
It tells me:
You are using IPv6 from 2001:5a8:4:910:2e0:81ff:fe28:989f
Other examples using the same address:
$ ping6 www.ipv6.org
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:5a8:4:910:2e0:81ff:fe28:989f --> 2001:6b0:1:ea:202:a5ff:fecd:13a6
16 bytes from 2001:6b0:1:ea:202:a5ff:fecd:13a6, icmp_seq=0 hlim=46 time=232.799 ms
16 bytes from 2001:6b0:1:ea:202:a5ff:fecd:13a6, icmp_seq=1 hlim=46 time=221.813 ms
^C
--- shake.stacken.kth.se ping6 statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 221.813/227.306/232.799/5.493 ms
$ traceroute6 www.ipv6.org
traceroute6 to shake.stacken.kth.se (2001:6b0:1:ea:202:a5ff:fecd:13a6) from 2001:5a8:0:1::123, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 tunnel-sonic-end 10.403 ms 9.59 ms 9.808 ms
2 2001:5a8:0:2:: 10.975 ms 11.265 ms 11.272 ms
3 2001:5a8:0:5::2 29.702 ms 27.767 ms 28.744 ms
4 6.fe-0-3.cr1.mci1.us.occaid.net 63.461 ms 56.255 ms 58.307 ms
5 57.ge0-0.cr1.ord1.us.occaid.net 73.837 ms 76.193 ms 73.618 ms
6 67.ge0-0.cr1.ewr1.us.occaid.net 99.422 ms 104.589 ms 100.941 ms
7 v3323-mpd.cr1.lhr1.uk.occaid.net 179.502 ms 180.222 ms 183.963 ms
8 14.fe0-0.cr1.arn1.se.occaid.net 231.974 ms 221.093 ms 226.875 ms
9 2001:16d8:2:80::8473:1 231.73 ms 221.749 ms 234.991 ms
10 2001:7f8:21:9::219 239.583 ms 223.381 ms 225.121 ms
11 * kthnoc6.sunet.se 233.513 ms 222.296 ms
12 stockholm1-SRP4.sunet.se 228.096 ms 228.883 ms 225.402 ms
13 * c1sth-ge5-0-9.sunet.se 253.215 ms 263.384 ms
14 2001:6b0:dead:beef:2::2c2 322.409 ms 233.344 ms 251.188 ms
15 2001:6b0:1:1d20::2 226.531 ms 256.238 ms 238.193 ms
16 clubroom-gw.stacken.kth.se 228.067 ms 361.125 ms 293.346 ms
17 igloo.stacken.kth.se 236.177 ms 236.188 ms 227.637 ms
// marc
Cory Albrechtwrote:
> dave wrote:
>> I would like to test IPv6 through my ISP (comcast). Are there any
>> websites that I can use ping6, traceroute6, etc with?
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Dave Feustel
>
> Many websites about IPv6 have little "you are connecting from ..."
> somewhere on their index page - http://www.go6.net/
> http://www.ipv6tf.org http://www.ipv6day.org/ http://ww.ipv6.org/
>
> My fave for checking is the venerable dancing kame at
> http://www.kame.net/ - if you get the animated turtle you've connected
> vi IPv6, if not then you've connected via IPv4.
>
> http://www.sixxs.net/tools/ipv6calc/ will try to do a reverse lookup to
> see if your nameserver is properly serving and reversing IPv6 addresses.
I had already visited sixxs but the URL you supply above is
particularly useful. It makes me think there is no IPv6 for me through comcast.
dave wrote:
> How do I switch to IPv6 http as suggested by kame?
If you are using Firefox, make sure that you did not set
network.dns.disableIPv6 = true. Or equivalent for your browser if not FFX.
However, IPv6 is enabled by default in FFX so there shouldn't be
anything to switch. If you have IPv6 routing set up properly you should
get the dancing kame.
If not, try "traceroute6 www.kame.net"[1]. If that doesn't work, do "dig
www.kame.net IN ANY" to check if you're getting back AAAA records to DNS
queries[2].
If you still can't get IPv6 traffic flowing to the outside world, show
us the results of "route -n show -inet6" and "ifconfig -a".
[1] traceroute to www.kame.net, though this was done from windows, hop 1
is my OpenBSD machine
Z:\>tracert -6 www.kame.net
Tracing route to www.kame.net [2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms bytor.wireless.fenris.cjb.net
[2001:5c0:92cf:1::c0a8:102]
2 29 ms 29 ms 30 ms 2001:5c0:8fff:fffe::5a3a
3 28 ms 27 ms 29 ms 2001:5c0:0:5::114
4 28 ms 28 ms 28 ms
if-5-0-1.6bb1.mtt-montreal.ipv6.teleglobe.net [2001:5a0:300::5]
5 29 ms 28 ms 28 ms
if-1-0.mcore3.mtt-montreal.ipv6.teleglobe.net [2001:5a0:300:100::1]
6 35 ms 37 ms 35 ms
if-13-0.mcore4.nqt-newyork.ipv6.teleglobe.net [2001:5a0:300:100::2]
7 228 ms 134 ms 57 ms 2001:5a0:400:200::1
8 39 ms 39 ms 40 ms 2001:5a0:600:200::1
9 42 ms 40 ms 41 ms 2001:5a0:600:200::6
10 41 ms 40 ms 41 ms 2001:5a0:600::5
11 57 ms 57 ms 54 ms ge-0.equi6ix.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net
[2001:504:0:2::2914:1]
12 56 ms 56 ms 56 ms xe-3-0-0.r20.asbnva01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
[2001:418:0:2000::f1]
13 129 ms 200 ms 204 ms as-0.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
[2001:418:0:2000::1de]
14 223 ms 203 ms 204 ms
p64-2-0-0.r21.mlpsca01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::115]
15 229 ms 230 ms 230 ms
p64-2-2-0.r20.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:218:0:2000::ce]
16 232 ms 231 ms 230 ms xe-0-0-0.a20.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net
[2001:218:0:6000::1a]
17 231 ms 231 ms 231 ms
ge-1-0-0-8.a13.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net [2001:218:2000:3008::14]
18 220 ms 220 ms 220 ms 2001:218:2000:5000::92
19 223 ms 224 ms 225 ms ve-4.nec2.yagami.wide.ad.jp
[2001:200:0:1c04:230:13ff:feae:5b]
20 223 ms 222 ms 223 ms lo0.alaxala1.k2.wide.ad.jp
[2001:200:0:4800::7800:1]
21 219 ms 221 ms 220 ms orange.kame.net
[2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085]
[2] dig www.kame.net IN ANY
[cory@bytor] 19:08:37 [102]~> dig www.kame.net IN ANY
; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P1 <<>> www.kame.net IN ANY
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55273
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.kame.net. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.kame.net. 85605 IN A 203.178.141.194
www.kame.net. 71625 IN AAAA
2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
kame.net. 71625 IN NS ns1.itojun.org.
kame.net. 71625 IN NS orange.kame.net.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.itojun.org. 163738 IN A 202.232.15.92
orange.kame.net. 3613 IN A 203.178.141.194
orange.kame.net. 71625 IN AAAA 2001:200:0:8000::42
orange.kame.net. 71625 IN AAAA
2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085
;; Query time: 8 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu Feb 8 19:09:22 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 211
davewrites:
> I had already visited sixxs but the URL you supply above is
> particularly useful. It makes me think there is no IPv6 for me through
> comcast.
Few ISPs supply native IPv6. My ISP does supply an IPv6 tunnel
as do places like HE (google HE ipv6 for info). The tunnel consists
of an IP address (the IP tunnel endpoint), 2 ipv6 addresses (the IPv6
tunnel endpoints), and your ipv6 assigned addresses. In my case
the info is this:
208.201.244.208 IP address of my gateway machine
2001:05a8:0:1::0123 my IPv6 tunnel address
208.201.234.221 ISP IP tunnel address
2001:05a8:0:1::0122 ISP IPv6 tunnel address
Setup is done in hostname.gif0
--------
tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
inet6 alias 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 128
dest 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
! route add -inet6 default ::1
! route change -inet6 default -ifp gif0
--------
The first line sets up the tunnel
the second assigns my ipv6 tunnel address
the third line assigns the ISP ipv6 tunnel address
the forth line prepares an ipv6 default route
the final line changes the ipv6 default route to use interface gif0
// marc
Marco S Hymanwrote:
> davewrites:
>
>> I had already visited sixxs but the URL you supply above is
>> particularly useful. It makes me think there is no IPv6 for me through
>> comcast.
>
> Few ISPs supply native IPv6. My ISP does supply an IPv6 tunnel
> as do places like HE (google HE ipv6 for info). The tunnel consists
> of an IP address (the IP tunnel endpoint), 2 ipv6 addresses (the IPv6
> tunnel endpoints), and your ipv6 assigned addresses. In my case
> the info is this:
>
> 208.201.244.208 IP address of my gateway machine
> 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 my IPv6 tunnel address
>
> 208.201.234.221 ISP IP tunnel address
> 2001:05a8:0:1::0122 ISP IPv6 tunnel address
>
> Setup is done in hostname.gif0
>
> --------
> tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
> inet6 alias 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 128
> dest 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
> ! route add -inet6 default ::1
> ! route change -inet6 default -ifp gif0
> --------
>
> The first line sets up the tunnel
> the second assigns my ipv6 tunnel address
> the third line assigns the ISP ipv6 tunnel address
> the forth line prepares an ipv6 default route
> the final line changes the ipv6 default route to use interface gif0
>
> // marc
This is what I call a high info density post!
Thanks!
On 09 Feb 2007 12:55:04 -0800, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>Few ISPs supply native IPv6. My ISP does supply an IPv6 tunnel
>as do places like HE (google HE ipv6 for info). The tunnel consists
>of an IP address (the IP tunnel endpoint), 2 ipv6 addresses (the IPv6
>tunnel endpoints), and your ipv6 assigned addresses. In my case
>the info is this:
>
>208.201.244.208 IP address of my gateway machine
>2001:05a8:0:1::0123 my IPv6 tunnel address
>
>208.201.234.221 ISP IP tunnel address
>2001:05a8:0:1::0122 ISP IPv6 tunnel address
>
>Setup is done in hostname.gif0
>
>--------
>tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
>inet6 alias 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 128
>dest 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
>! route add -inet6 default ::1
>! route change -inet6 default -ifp gif0
>--------
Slightly shorter:
up tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
up inet6 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 2001:05a8:0:1::0122 prefixlen 128
!route -qn add -inet6 default 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
--
Maurice
Maurice Janssenwrites:
> >tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
> >inet6 alias 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 128
> >dest 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
> >! route add -inet6 default ::1
> >! route change -inet6 default -ifp gif0
>
> Slightly shorter:
>
> up tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
> up inet6 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 2001:05a8:0:1::0122 prefixlen 128
> !route -qn add -inet6 default 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
Shorter isn't always better. If a default route exists the route
command in the shorter version will fail. With the longer version
the route add will fail, but the route change will still take effect,
insuring that the default route is set as desired.
// marc
On 11 Feb 2007 21:28:11 -0800, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>Maurice Janssenwrites:
>
>> >tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
>> >inet6 alias 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 128
>> >dest 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
>> >! route add -inet6 default ::1
>> >! route change -inet6 default -ifp gif0
>>
>> Slightly shorter:
>>
>> up tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221
>> up inet6 2001:05a8:0:1::0123 2001:05a8:0:1::0122 prefixlen 128
>> !route -qn add -inet6 default 2001:05a8:0:1::0122
>
>Shorter isn't always better.
That's true.
>If a default route exists the route
>command in the shorter version will fail. With the longer version
>the route add will fail, but the route change will still take effect,
>insuring that the default route is set as desired.
That's a good point, but in my case the default route isn't going to
change anytime soon. I prefer the single route command because it's
easier for me to read and understand.
--
Maurice