USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S) - BSD
This is a discussion on USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S) - BSD ; I note that in http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html this NIC is marked as
supported. I just installed one in a 3.7-stable system (generic kernel) - no
dice. The relevant part of the dmesg is:
>> vendor "US Robotics", unknown product 0x0116 (class network ...
-
USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S)
I note that in http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html this NIC is marked as
supported. I just installed one in a 3.7-stable system (generic kernel) - no
dice. The relevant part of the dmesg is:
>> vendor "US Robotics", unknown product 0x0116 (class network subclass
>> ethernet, rev 0x10) at pci1 dev 10 function 0 not configured <<
What am I missing? All clues gratefully received.
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
-
Re: USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S)
Steve at fivetrees wrote:
> I note that in http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html this NIC is marked as
> supported. I just installed one in a 3.7-stable system (generic kernel) - no
> dice. The relevant part of the dmesg is:
> >> vendor "US Robotics", unknown product 0x0116 (class network subclass
> >> ethernet, rev 0x10) at pci1 dev 10 function 0 not configured <<
>
> What am I missing? All clues gratefully received.
>
> Steve
> http://www.fivetrees.com
it's a variant that's not supported, or for which support has been
added since 3.7.
-
Re: USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S)
"tedu" wrote in message
news:1127756713.781098.194060@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
> Steve at fivetrees wrote:
>> I note that in http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html this NIC is marked as
>> supported. I just installed one in a 3.7-stable system (generic kernel) -
>> no
>> dice. The relevant part of the dmesg is:
>> >> vendor "US Robotics", unknown product 0x0116 (class network subclass
>> >> ethernet, rev 0x10) at pci1 dev 10 function 0 not configured <<
>>
>> What am I missing? All clues gratefully received.
>
> it's a variant that's not supported, or for which support has been
> added since 3.7.
It's definitely a USR997902 - but I suspect you're right on the money re the
"since 3.7" bit. The RE(4) man page on the box in question doesn't mention
this NIC, in contrast to
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.c...i386&sektion=4.
Bums. Will have to wait for November 
Thanks for the pointer.
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
-
Re: USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S)
"Steve at fivetrees" writes:
> Bums. Will have to wait for November 
or grab a snapshot. they should be rather close to 3.8 atm.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
-
Re: USR997902 Gigabit NIC (8169S)
"Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote in message
news:86irwnpqiw.fsf@amidala.datadok.no...
> "Steve at fivetrees" writes:
>
>> Bums. Will have to wait for November 
>
> or grab a snapshot. they should be rather close to 3.8 atm.
Yeah, considered this. But I have a severe allergy to the bleeding edge
.
I'll wait (or buy a different NIC). No rush.
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com