Micha³ Kurowski wrote:

> Perhaps I'm missing something here:
>
> Have any ports in stable 4.2 and 4.1 been updated
> recently ? I can see the latest changes introduced
> two monthes ago. I was looking at ftp servers.
>
> At the same time everything seems to be OK
> with the development in -current.
>
> If there's some kind of policy change
> I wouldn't like to miss it ;-)
>

You missed FAQ. You should read it.

Briefly:
- http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsFetch
- http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun


--
tkniaz

> Briefly:
> -http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsFetch
> -http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun


Sorry, but it's you who *did not* read my question.

Micha³ Kurowski wrote:

> If there's some kind of policy change
> I wouldn't like to miss it ;-)

-stable is unmaintained now.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119347390302171&w=2

--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

Micha³ Kurowski wrote:

> Perhaps I'm missing something here:
> Have any ports in stable 4.2 and 4.1 been updated
> recently ? I can see the latest changes introduced
> two monthes ago. I was looking at ftp servers.
> At the same time everything seems to be OK
> with the development in -current.
> If there's some kind of policy change
> I wouldn't like to miss it ;-)

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119629216829184&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119629335730810&w=2
and so on...

--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn

mkur@gazeta.pl wrote:
>> Briefly:
>> -http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsFetch
>> -http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
>
>
> Sorry, but it's you who *did not* read my question.
>

Damn it, you are right! I'm very sorry for that.

--
tkniaz