Re: Wine - Yet Another LinTard Failure - BSD

This is a discussion on Re: Wine - Yet Another LinTard Failure - BSD ; "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote in message news:YiM%i.14683$xa2.7417@read2.cgocable.net... > > "High Plains Thumper" wrote >> There is more to it. If you want to run Windows applications, use Wine >> or commercial equivalent. > > There is no commercial equivalent to wine. > ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: Wine - Yet Another LinTard Failure

  1. Re: Wine - Yet Another LinTard Failure

    "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote in message
    news:YiM%i.14683$xa2.7417@read2.cgocable.net...
    >
    > "High Plains Thumper" wrote
    >> There is more to it. If you want to run Windows applications, use Wine
    >> or commercial equivalent.

    >
    > There is no commercial equivalent to wine.
    >
    > And Wine has never been out of beta. Further, even it's own creators
    > claim it can't be taken seriously.
    >
    > Wine - Yet another LinTard Failure.
    >


    TROLL


  2. Re: Wine - Yet Another LinTard Failure

    Just Another Person Who Could Use Ubuntu. Just FYI


    "Martin Langsholt" wrote in message
    news:fhrs41$hi0$1@news.get.no...
    > "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote in
    > message news:YiM%i.14683$xa2.7417@read2.cgocable.net...
    >>
    >> "High Plains Thumper" wrote
    >>> There is more to it. If you want to run Windows applications, use Wine
    >>> or commercial equivalent.

    >>
    >> There is no commercial equivalent to wine.
    >>
    >> And Wine has never been out of beta. Further, even it's own creators
    >> claim it can't be taken seriously.
    >>
    >> Wine - Yet another LinTard Failure.
    >>

    >
    > TROLL




+ Reply to Thread