CIO is only available with JFS2 as example, but look yourself:
>http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...s_jfs_jfs2.htm
>http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/wh...s_aix_perf.pdf

Bye, Stefan ... . . .

Roger Tango wrote:
> Are there any advantages to jfs2 over jfs outside of the larger files and
> filesystems allowed? Are there any whitepapers/redbooks etc. that address
> this?
>
> Thanks
>
>

I found this document interesting:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/p/os/a...s/jfs_vfs.html

jfs2 also frees you from knowing your inode-requirements beforehand
which I find is a big plus.
Anyway, there have been quite some bugfixes in jfs2 functionality in the
recent years (the filesystem shrinking code e.g.). So I consider jfs
more mature.

"sllabres" wrote in message
news:1190043224.319348.171520@y42g2000hsy.googlegr oups.com...
> CIO is only available with JFS2 as example, but look yourself:
>>http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...s_jfs_jfs2.htm
>>http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/wh...s_aix_perf.pdf
>
> Bye, Stefan ... . . .
>

Thanks, that performance whitepaper is just the ticket.

On Sep 18, 12:40 am, "Roger Tango" wrote:
> Are there any advantages to jfs2 over jfs outside of the larger files and
> filesystems allowed? Are there any whitepapers/redbooks etc. that address
> this?
>
> Thanks

My biggest negative to JFS2 was a bug in AIX 5.2 when I tried to
restore a mksysb for a rootvg that had the "JFS2=yes" option on; could
not restore it; very annoying.