<"tholen@antispam.ham"> <"tholen@antispam.ham"> <"tholen@antispam.ham">
<"tholen@antispam.ham"> <"tholen@antispam.ham"> <"tholen@antispam.ham">
<"tholen@antispam.ham"> <"tholen@antispam.ham"> wrote:

>Still afraid of having Google archive

No, I'm not afraid of Google. See if you can think of a second reason.

>the evidence for your kooky,
>inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

Are you still beating your wife, Tholen?

>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Perhaps if you explain what "attribution problems" are, Tholen, I might
choose to answer this oft-asked question.
>
>15488> Well done, Tholen, you copied the wrong subject line.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim

Sorry, I made a mistake.

Well done, Tholen, you forgot to remove "Malloy" from the subject line
of the post to which you replied. For today, at least, you were able
to generate your standard subject lines for your multi-posted spam.

A least I'm able to punctuate sentences -- suffering from "typing
problems", Tholen?
>
>15488> I won't bother to ask how you came to assume that being afraid
>of
>15488> something is the one and only reason a person would choose to
>set the
>15488> No Archive option, Tholen.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really. Classic evasion.

You are in no position to demand that anyone answer your questions,
Tholen, as you never answer any yourself. And I was correct to assume
that you wouldn't be explaining your illogical conclusion.
>
>15488> But this hardly the first time that you've
>15488> presumed to known and understand the motives of others posting
>to
>15488> usenet.
>
>Especially after others have posted their motives in the newsgroup,
>Deco. All it takes is a little reading comprehension skill to know
>and understand the motives. Of course, you've demonstrated a lack
>of reading comprehension skills, so it's easy to understand why you
>consider it a presumption, Deco.

You presumed to understand my motives for using XNA, Tholen, and your
presumption is completely incorrect. Also, I've never posted anything
to indicate what my purposes for using XNA are, yet you claim to have
superior "reading comprehension skills", and to know what my reasons
are.

>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really. Classic evasion.

Logic isn't your strong suit, Tholen, but pegging irony meters is.

>Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
>inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

What does your illogical conclusion about my motives for using XNA have
to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>15489> Read the FAQ.
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?

Note: no response.
>
>15490> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>15490> Message-ID: <240820082019442717%erfc-1024@usa.net>
>15490> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
>inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

What does your illogical conclusion about my motives for using XNA have
to do with OS/2, Tholen?

>St



--
This space to let.