On Aug 22, 8:41*am, "P. Sture"
wrote:
> In article ,
> *koeh...@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) wrote:
>
> > In article <00A7E75B.E1A3D...@SendSpamHere.ORG>, * VAXman- *@SendSpamHere.ORG
> > writes:
> > > FWIW, reading the patch description text (Yes, with my specs on), there
> > > is nothing to indicate the severity of or need for applying this patch!
> > > I'd wager that there are sites that will NEVER install this patch unless
> > > they see some buffer overflow in SMG. *Unless this patch is listed as a
> > > SECURITY patch, people not following what has been going on here for the
> > > better part of a week will not install it.
>
> > * *Yes. *the rating is INSTAL_1, but it should be a MUP!
>
> I second that 100%!
>
> --
> Paul Sture
FWIW, I sent Ann Mc... a comment regarding the MUP Vs Install 1
thingie.