On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:20:54 -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:41:13 -0700, AGT wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:54:56 -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
>
>>> I did try building gcc-4 only as an exercise. The GNU compiler which
>>> ships with Solaris is quite adequate for building even the latest version
>>> of the qt library, KDE and everything else which I wanted available and
>>> which would not build with Studio12. qt will build with Studio12 but KDE
>>> pukes with Sun's compiler.

KDE - talk about a work in "progress".. : <
A pity as I rather like its look and feel compared to GNOME

>> Agreed - sometimes the code is so BAD only gcc will compile it : >
> Exactly! Are there any CFLAGS for Studio12 which will cause the compiler
> to overlook those errors as gcc does?

"those" errors? cc has an awful lot of switches, rather well documented
I recall that 12 is more gcc tolerant or like in some respects but the
details I do not recall. But I do not think mplayer for example will build
w/o some extensive fixups.